it makes absolute sense that he would respond to this; however, his responses to major tragic events are selective. when he feels personally invested in something (or when his masters tell him to do so) he will respond. he can 'hold off on judgement' in this particular case. he refuses to openly, in his address, say that Roof is a terrorist (despite ample evidence of devaluing African lives), while he can outright call those who revolt against a system which ALSO devalues African lives, 'thugs.' Property is more important than human lives, and Roof has the 'complexion for the protection', as they say. if Roof were of a darker hue (AND practised islam), the percentages of him being shot on site, in his vehicle, by the feds would have been significantly higher. <br /> <br />just another game of politricks. now move along...
