Iowa Caucus Results Are<br />Riddled With Errors, Analysis Reveals According to 'The New York Times,' <br />the inconsistencies are not likely to <br />significantly affect the winner's margin of lead. But several types of errors <br />were discovered in the reported <br />results of more than 100 Iowa voting precincts. The errors include missing <br />data, contradictory or impossible <br />reporting and other types of errors. Analysis by 'The New York Times' <br />reveals that the errors do not seem to <br />be intentional, but some are significant. This means that due <br />to the slim victory margin Buttigieg <br />currently has over Bernie Sanders, there could be further delays <br />once 100 percent of the precincts <br />have reported their results. 97 percent of Iowa precincts <br />have currently reported results. The Iowa Democratic Party <br />has received a great deal of criticism <br />due to delays and confusion related to the caucuses. Most of the confusion has been <br />blamed on a vote tallying and reporting <br />app created by company Shadow Inc.
