Justice Thomas Says , Contraception, Same-Sex Marriage Rulings , Should Be Reconsidered.<br />After Roe v. Wade was overturned on June 24, Justice Clarence Thomas argued that the Supreme Court "should reconsider" <br />past rulings regarding Americans' rights.<br />After Roe v. Wade was overturned on June 24, Justice Clarence Thomas argued that the Supreme Court "should reconsider" <br />past rulings regarding Americans' rights.<br />Politico reports that Thomas suggests re-examining rights to contraception access, same-sex relationships and same-sex marriage.<br />The suggestion comes on the same day the Court ruled to revoke the constitutional right to an abortion by overturning Roe v. Wade.<br />Thomas wrote that the Court should now reconsider three cases regarding the rights to fundamental privacy, due process and equal protection. .<br />Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and <br />Elena Kagan opposed the decision on abortion rights, saying , “no one should be confident that <br />this majority is done with its work.”.<br />Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and <br />Elena Kagan opposed the decision on abortion rights, saying , “no one should be confident that <br />this majority is done with its work.”.<br />In May, President Joe Biden warned that overthrowing Roe v. Wade would bring into question other rulings regarding peoples' rights.<br />If the rationale of the decision as released were to be sustained, a whole range of rights are in question. A whole range of rights, Joe Biden, President of the United States, via Politico.<br />And the idea [that] we’re letting <br />the states make those decisions,<br />localities make those decisions, <br />would be a fundamental shift <br />in what we’ve done, Joe Biden, President of the United States, via Politico.<br />However, Conservative Justice Samuel Alito has repeatedly insisted that the decision to overthrow Roe v. Wade <br />will not pose a threat to other precedents.<br />However, Conservative Justice Samuel Alito has repeatedly insisted that the decision to overthrow Roe v. Wade <br />will not pose a threat to other precedents.<br />Our decision concerns the constitutional <br />right to abortion and no other right. <br />Nothing in this opinion should <br />be understood to cast doubt on <br />precedents that do not concern abortion, Samuel Alito, Supreme Court Justice, via Politico
