Supreme Court Allows , Biden Administration To End , Trump's 'Remain in Mexico' Policy.<br />Supreme Court Allows , Biden Administration To End , Trump's 'Remain in Mexico' Policy.<br />On June 30, the Supreme Court ruled<br />that the Biden administration can repeal <br />the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols.<br />On June 30, the Supreme Court ruled<br />that the Biden administration can repeal <br />the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols.<br />The "Remain in Mexico" policy forced migrants <br />seeking asylum in the United States to <br />stay in Mexico while awaiting hearings.<br />The policy was put in place by the Trump administration <br />to prevent migrants from being released into the U.S. <br />while waiting for a decision from immigration.<br />The policy was put in place by the Trump administration <br />to prevent migrants from being released into the U.S. <br />while waiting for a decision from immigration.<br />The Biden administration's previous attempts to repeal the policy were blocked by a lower court.<br />Fox News reports that the issue in question was whether the Department of Homeland Security's termination of the policy was a violation of federal law. .<br />Texas and Missouri reportedly argued<br />that without the ability to detain every <br />migrant, it is necessary to send them back.<br />Texas and Missouri reportedly argued<br />that without the ability to detain every <br />migrant, it is necessary to send them back.<br />During oral arguments before the Supreme Court, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that the policy was not needed in order to comply with federal law.<br />During oral arguments before the Supreme Court, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that the policy was not needed in order to comply with federal law.<br />On this reading, every presidential <br />administration in an unbroken line for <br />the past quarter century has been in open <br />violation of the [Immigration and Nationality <br />Act]. If Congress wanted to mandate <br />those results, it would have spoken clearly, Elizabeth Prelogar, U.S. Solicitor General, via Fox News.<br />Justice Clarence Thomas echoed <br />Preloger's stance during oral arguments. .<br />Thomas reportedly questioned whether it was <br />an "odd" decision for Congress to pass a law <br />that the government was unable to follow.<br />Thomas reportedly questioned whether it was <br />an "odd" decision for Congress to pass a law <br />that the government was unable to follow
