US Judge Rules Subway , Can Be Sued Over Tuna Products.<br />Reuters reports that on July 11, a federal judge <br />declared Subway could be held liable for <br />deceiving customers about its tuna products.<br />Instead of Subway's advertised "100% tuna," <br />others have claimed the restaurant's product <br />contains chicken, pork, cattle and other kinds of fish.<br />Although it is possible that Subway's explanations are <br />the correct ones... , U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar, via Reuters.<br />... it is also possible that these allegations refer to ingredients <br />that a reasonable consumer would <br />not reasonably expect to find <br />in a tuna product. , U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar, via Reuters.<br />Subway officials contend the restaurant <br />"serves 100% tuna," lamenting the continuation <br />of the "reckless and improper" lawsuit.<br />We are confident that <br />Subway will prevail when <br />the court has an opportunity <br />to consider all the evidence. , Subway, via Reuters.<br />When researchers at UCLA's Barber Lab tested samples of Subway's tuna, .<br />they reportedly found "no detectable tuna DNA sequences." Instead, lab tests found <br />the DNA of chicken, pork and cattle.<br />Subway operates over 37,000 restaurants. .<br />The company has repeatedly defended its tuna in recent advertisement campaigns
